The Truth About Family Business Succession: Do They Really Want It?

March 5, 2025

Generational succession - handing your business across to your kids or family - sounds simple enough but, many families end up in a dispute right at the point when the parents, business, and children are most vulnerable. It’s important that generational succession is managed as closely and diligently as if you were selling your business to a stranger to avoid misunderstandings and disputes.

A 2016 article in The Economist stated, 'Succession is a problem for family businesses the world over. The Family Business Institute calculates that only 30% of such businesses survive into the second generation, only 12% into the third generation and only 3% into the fourth.’


The Economist, succession failure www.economist.com/business/2016/02/04/succession-failure.


Planning to pass your business to family? Consider these critical points:

1. Are they genuinely willing and dedicated to running it?

2. Do they possess the necessary skills and experience?

3. Can they maintain and grow the business's value?


A successful handover relies on "yes" answers to all three.


Capability and willingness of the next generation – do your kids really want the business?


There needs to be a realistic assessment of whether or not the business can continue successfully after the transition. In some cases, the exiting generation will pursue generational succession either as a means of keeping the business in the family, perpetuating their legacy, or to provide a stable business future for the next generation. All of these are reasonable objectives, however, they only work where there is capability and willingness.


The alternative scenario can also exist where generational succession is pursued by the younger generation. In some cases, it’s seen as their birth right. In these cases, the willingness will exist but this does not automatically translate to capability.


Failing to plan for succession, and simply assuming it will happen, risks significant financial losses and

damaged family relationships.


Capital transfer – how much money needs to be taken out of the business during the transition?


What level of capital do the current business owners, generally the parents exiting the business, need to extract from the business at the time of the transition? The higher the level of capital needed, the greater the pressure that will be placed on the business and the remaining equity stakeholders.


In most cases, the incoming generation will not have sufficient capital to buy out the exiting generation.


This will require the vendors to maintain a continuing investment in the business or for the business to take on an increased level of debt, or possibly a vendor finance arrangement that brings with it its own complications. It is not uncommon to see external bank loan repayment terms that put so much pressure on cash flow, that the buyer ends up with no extra money after taxes and repayments, which can

demotivate the buyer.


In many cases, the exiting generation will want to maintain a level of equity investment. This might be a means of retaining an interest in the business or alternatively staging their transition. In either case, it is important to map the capital transition both from a business and shareholder perspective. This needs to be documented and signed off firstly from the business’s perspective and then by both generational groups. No generational transition should be undertaken without a clear and agreed capital program.


Income needs – ensuring remuneration is on commercial terms


In many SMEs, the owners arrange their remuneration from the business to meet their needs rather than being reasonable compensation for the roles undertaken. This can result in the business either paying too much or too little.


Under a generational succession, there should be an increased level of formality around compensation to directors and shareholders. Compensation should be matched to roles and where performance incentives exist these should be clearly structured.


Operating and management control


Once the capability and capital assessments have been completed, it is important to look at the transition of control. This can be a very sensitive area. It’s essential to establish and agree in advance how operating and management control will be maintained and transitioned. The plan for operating and management control should be documented and signed off by all parties with either timelines for time driven succession or milestones for event-focussed transitions.


Uncertainty in management leads to business-damaging confusion or a power vacuum. When a founder's identity becomes inextricably linked to the business, their reluctance to relinquish control can become counterproductive and even self-sabotaging. Founder's syndrome is common, with the founder clinging to control and resistant to change, often creating an environment where successors feel stifled, undervalued, and ultimately driven away.


Without a documented (and followed) plan, issues arise:

● Successors want autonomy.

● They feel powerless without control.

● Predecessors want continued influence.

● Investment is seen as control.

● Roles are unclear.


Transition timeframes and expectations


Generational succession is often a process rather than an event and achieved over an extended period of time. The critical issue is to identify and ensure that all parties have a common understanding and acceptance of the time period over which the transition will take place. This should be included in the documented succession plan.


The need for greater formality and management structure



Generational succession often requires a greater level of formality in the management and decision making process. This formality should achieve a separation of function between management, the Board (if applicable), and shareholders.


Often in an SME business, these roles merge and there are no clear dividing lines or boundaries. Roles, responsibilities, and clear key performance indicators (KPIs) for management should be agreed and documented.


Navigating family business succession is a complex journey, fraught with potential pitfalls and emotional complexities. As we've highlighted, assuming a smooth transition can lead to significant financial and family strain. Ensuring a successful handover requires meticulous planning, open communication, and a realistic assessment of all parties involved. From evaluating the next generation's true aspirations and capabilities to structuring a sustainable capital transfer and defining clear management roles, every aspect demands careful consideration.


Don't let your legacy become another statistic.


To safeguard your business and your family's future, contact us today. We can help you develop a comprehensive succession plan that addresses these critical issues, ensuring a seamless and prosperous transition for generations to come.


Ready to talk with us?

Fill in the form below and we'll be in touch to tell you to arrange an obligation free initial meeting.

Contact Us

Like this article? Share it with people you know!

February 24, 2026
When clients sell a long-held family home, they may be able to channel part of the proceeds into superannuation by using the downsizer contribution rules. Basic Eligibility Conditions To qualify, the seller must meet a number of conditions: · They must have reached the eligible age of 55 years (at the time of making the contribution). · The eligible dwelling must be located in Australia and have been owned for at least 10 years. · The disposal of the dwelling must be exempt from CGT under the main residence exemption to some extent (full exemption not required). · The contribution must be made within 90 days of settlement, and an election form must be lodged with the fund no later than when the contribution is received. The downsizer contribution can only be used once per individual and is limited to the lesser of the gross sale proceeds or $300,000 per person. Does the Sale Need to be Fully CGT-exempt? A common question is whether the sale must be fully exempt as the main residence. Importantly, a full exemption is not required. Even if only part of the capital gain is exempt under main residence rules, the property may still qualify — provided all other conditions are met. Is the Property Required to be the Main Residence at Sale? Equally important: the property does not need to be the seller’s principal residence at the time of sale. Living in the property for some years and renting it out later does not disqualify it, as long as the ownership and residence history supports at least a partial main residence exemption. Special Rules for Pre-CGT Properties Where a property was acquired before CGT began, the rules look at whether part of the gain would have been disregarded had CGT applied. A key requirement is that there is a dwelling that qualifies as the main residence. Disposal of vacant land will generally not satisfy the test and therefore will not meet downsizer requirements. Eligibility of a Non-Owning Spouse It is common for only one spouse to be listed on the property title. A non-owning spouse may still qualify for a downsizer contribution if all other requirements are met, apart from ownership. However, a spouse who never lived in the property and could not reasonably have treated it as their main residence is unlikely to be eligible. Preservation and Access to Funds A downsizer contribution is subject to the standard preservation rules. Once contributed, the amount cannot be accessed until: · You reach preservation age (60) and retire, or · You reach age 65, regardless of retirement status. Consider future cash-flow needs before making the contribution. Before you Contribute Although seemingly straightforward, downsizer contributions involve several nuances. Please contact us if you have any questions. Related links: · Downsizer super contributions · Downsizer contributions and capital gains tax
February 17, 2026
For many Australians, a holiday home does double duty. It’s a place to escape with family and friends, and during the rest of the year it’s listed on Airbnb or Stayz to help cover the costs. Until recently, many owners assumed they could claim most of the usual deductions for the property without much trouble, as long as appropriate apportionments were made. However, that position is now under more scrutiny than ever following the release of some new draft guidance documents by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) - TR 2025/D1, PCG 2025/D6 and PCG 2025/D7. The ATO is looking to significantly tighten the rules around holiday homes that are used to derive some rental income. While the documents are still in draft form, they clearly signal the ATO’s compliance focus going forward. What is the ATO Concerned About? In simple terms, the ATO wants to distinguish between properties that are genuinely held to maximise rental income and those that are primarily lifestyle assets with some incidental rental use. The ATO confirms that all rental income must be declared, even if it is occasional or earned through informal arrangements. However, if the property is really a holiday home and isn’t used mainly to produce rental income during the year then the owner can’t claim any deductions for expenses such as interest, rates, land tax, repairs and maintenance. That is, the ATO might not allow any of these expenses to be claimed as a deduction, even if the property is used to generate taxable rental income for some of the year at market rates. If the property is classified as a holiday home by the ATO then owners can only claim deductions for limited direct expenses such as cleaning or advertising. The ATO is particularly focused on properties that: · Are blocked out for private use during peak periods (for example, school holidays or ski season), · Are advertised inconsistently or at above-market rates, · Generate ongoing tax losses year after year. How Expenses Must be Claimed Even if the property isn’t classified as a holiday home, it will often still be necessary to apportion expenses if the property is only used partly for income producing purposes. PCG 2025/D6 outlines how expenses should be apportioned. The key principle is that claims must be “fair and reasonable”. Common methods include: · Time-based apportionment (for example, based on days rented or genuinely available for rent), and · Area-based apportionment (where only part of a property is rented). Getting this wrong, or failing to keep evidence, increases audit risk. The ATO has access to booking platform data and can easily compare listings, calendars and reported income. The Financial Impact can be Significant Consider a holiday unit that earns $30,000 a year in off-peak rent but is kept for private use during peak holiday periods. Under the new approach, the ATO may conclude the property is really a holiday home and could reduce deductible expenses from tens of thousands of dollars to only a small fraction, resulting in a materially higher tax bill. Co-ownership also needs care. Income and deductions are generally split according to ownership interests, regardless of who uses the property more. Renting to relatives at discounted rates can further limit deductions. Practical Steps you Should Take Now Although the guidance is proposed to apply from 1 July 2026 (with transitional relief for arrangements in place before 12 November 2025), now is the time to review your position: · Are you holding and using the property to genuinely maximise rental income? Is the property advertised broadly and consistently, including during peak periods? · Use market pricing: Set rent in line with comparable properties in the same area. · Keep strong records: Retain booking calendars, advertisements, enquiries, and a diary showing private versus rental use. · Review ownership and strategy: In some cases, changing how a property is operated can improve its commercial profile and tax outcome, but beware of CGT liabilities, duty and legal fees. · Document existing arrangements: If you may qualify for transitional relief, evidence is critical. The Bottom Line The ATO is not banning deductions for holiday homes, but it is drawing a firmer line between genuine investment properties and lifestyle assets. With the right structure, pricing and record-keeping, many owners can still claim appropriate deductions and improve cash flow.  If you own a holiday property, a proactive review could save you from an unpleasant surprise later. Please contact us if you would like us to assess your current arrangements and help you plan ahead.